<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If it&#8217;s free, exactly how much would that be worth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/</link>
	<description>online mother</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>I thought about responding to these comments  enough that I actually thought I had. But apparently not. And, if you had been inclined to check back, you&#039;ve probably given up by now. Sorry. 

Marie -- I hear you, and appreciate the good advice. The only thing is that I have never had any desire to make lotion, so I can&#039;t see getting too worked up about it. Writing + Ideas about Motherhood push a whole bunch of my buttons, = mixed feelings. Oh, and I totally agree on the . . . I want to say &quot;journalistic integrity&quot; requiring an honest review. 

Tara -- thanks. I don&#039;t know what I&#039;d do without friends who happen to be bloggers.

Marianne -- &quot;Free is a two-way street, baby&quot; -- yet another great idea for a blog title/tagline. Will be sending you part of the first big bundle of review chocolate/caffeine I get. 

Michelle -- Thanks for commenting. I know you don&#039;t know me from Eve. Why do I always feel like things are aimed at me (when I was already feeling culpable, that is). 

Dad -- Thanks for commenting. You telling me that you love my writing is better than a Pulitzer. Almost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought about responding to these comments  enough that I actually thought I had. But apparently not. And, if you had been inclined to check back, you&#8217;ve probably given up by now. Sorry. </p>
<p>Marie &#8212; I hear you, and appreciate the good advice. The only thing is that I have never had any desire to make lotion, so I can&#8217;t see getting too worked up about it. Writing + Ideas about Motherhood push a whole bunch of my buttons, = mixed feelings. Oh, and I totally agree on the . . . I want to say &#8220;journalistic integrity&#8221; requiring an honest review. </p>
<p>Tara &#8212; thanks. I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;d do without friends who happen to be bloggers.</p>
<p>Marianne &#8212; &#8220;Free is a two-way street, baby&#8221; &#8212; yet another great idea for a blog title/tagline. Will be sending you part of the first big bundle of review chocolate/caffeine I get. </p>
<p>Michelle &#8212; Thanks for commenting. I know you don&#8217;t know me from Eve. Why do I always feel like things are aimed at me (when I was already feeling culpable, that is). </p>
<p>Dad &#8212; Thanks for commenting. You telling me that you love my writing is better than a Pulitzer. Almost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okay. I&#8217;m back. I think. &#171; Pragmatic Compendium</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>okay. I&#8217;m back. I think. &#171; Pragmatic Compendium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5385</guid>
		<description>[...] giving me a heads up on the next book I want: &#8220;Sleep is for the Weak.&#8221; And now Jane at What about Mom? has given yet another nudge to read &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; boost since I read that Shannon at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giving me a heads up on the next book I want: &#8220;Sleep is for the Weak.&#8221; And now Jane at What about Mom? has given yet another nudge to read &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; boost since I read that Shannon at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad hyatt</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>dad hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5378</guid>
		<description>Shannon, I can so relate.  Many times I have wished to recall an irretrievable communication.  One rule that I don&#039;t follow often enough is to write it out, but don&#039;t send it for 1-7 days.  The delay varies by the passion with which it was originally written.  Passion is good, but need to be controlled, right?

I agree, however, with the above comments.

Love your writing!

Love, Dad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon, I can so relate.  Many times I have wished to recall an irretrievable communication.  One rule that I don&#8217;t follow often enough is to write it out, but don&#8217;t send it for 1-7 days.  The delay varies by the passion with which it was originally written.  Passion is good, but need to be controlled, right?</p>
<p>I agree, however, with the above comments.</p>
<p>Love your writing!</p>
<p>Love, Dad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle at Scribbit</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle at Scribbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>Well I have been known to do scathing reviews, though not very often and they&#039;re so much fun to write and so entertaining for me that I feel guilty afterwards, as if I almost was glad it was bad just to get me some material :)  It&#039;s a hard job being a critic.

Michelle at Scribbits last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Scribbit/~3/291502416/what-do-you-do-when-your-child-lies.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What Do You Do When Your Child Lies?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I have been known to do scathing reviews, though not very often and they&#8217;re so much fun to write and so entertaining for me that I feel guilty afterwards, as if I almost was glad it was bad just to get me some material <img src='http://www.seagullfountain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   It&#8217;s a hard job being a critic.</p>
<p>Michelle at Scribbits last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Scribbit/~3/291502416/what-do-you-do-when-your-child-lies.html" rel="nofollow">What Do You Do When Your Child Lies?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5371</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5371</guid>
		<description>You do have to be honest about your opinion; it is, after all, your opinion.  One you have to be able to sleep with at night.

As for blasting the book, flip the coin and consider the source and the purpose.  A PR dude/dudette contacted you to review the book on your blog because they wanted to get free buzz.  That they didn&#039;t get what they wanted -- for free, I might add, other than the cost of the copy of the book -- is too bad, so sad.  

If they wanted fabulous, gushing, raving reviews, they could&#039;ve ponied up some $$ to a blogger who would have been happy to give them all the joyful free press they wanted.

Free is a two-way street, baby!

And if you do get offered to review any chocolate or caffeinated bevs, do be sure to send them my link, too!  Always happy to help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do have to be honest about your opinion; it is, after all, your opinion.  One you have to be able to sleep with at night.</p>
<p>As for blasting the book, flip the coin and consider the source and the purpose.  A PR dude/dudette contacted you to review the book on your blog because they wanted to get free buzz.  That they didn&#8217;t get what they wanted &#8212; for free, I might add, other than the cost of the copy of the book &#8212; is too bad, so sad.  </p>
<p>If they wanted fabulous, gushing, raving reviews, they could&#8217;ve ponied up some $$ to a blogger who would have been happy to give them all the joyful free press they wanted.</p>
<p>Free is a two-way street, baby!</p>
<p>And if you do get offered to review any chocolate or caffeinated bevs, do be sure to send them my link, too!  Always happy to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarable</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5361</link>
		<dc:creator>tarable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5361</guid>
		<description>I think you always give your honest opinion, and anyone who reads your blog couldn&#039;t expect anything less.  You should certainly be allowed to not like something and give your criticisms.  Although I thought the post that contained your first review was a brilliant piece of writing, I was glad to read your second review.  I thought your examples were good and I agree with you about the maddening message the author seemed to give.  Everyone&#039;s entitled to their own opion, right?  Especially on their own blog.

tarables last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaraThinks/~3/280100911/my-martha-stewart-living.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Martha Stewart Living&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you always give your honest opinion, and anyone who reads your blog couldn&#8217;t expect anything less.  You should certainly be allowed to not like something and give your criticisms.  Although I thought the post that contained your first review was a brilliant piece of writing, I was glad to read your second review.  I thought your examples were good and I agree with you about the maddening message the author seemed to give.  Everyone&#8217;s entitled to their own opion, right?  Especially on their own blog.</p>
<p>tarables last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaraThinks/~3/280100911/my-martha-stewart-living.html" rel="nofollow">My Martha Stewart Living</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memarie Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.seagullfountain.com/2008/05/16/if-its-free-exactly-how-much-would-that-be-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-5360</link>
		<dc:creator>Memarie Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seagullfountain.com/?p=960#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>When you said Gail had worked on your shoulder, at first I thought you were talking about a shoulder angel.

In my experience reviewing products, you&#039;re expected to be honest, both by the PR people and your readers. I posted a negative review of some lotion that was just terrible, and the PR company simply sent me a different kind to try. By sending it back or withholding your opinion, I&#039;d think you were being dishonest. In fact I&#039;m really suspicious of something when I only ever see gushing reviews for it.

Memarie Lanes last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MemarieLane/~3/291331293/tell-me-truth-now.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tell me the truth now.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you said Gail had worked on your shoulder, at first I thought you were talking about a shoulder angel.</p>
<p>In my experience reviewing products, you&#8217;re expected to be honest, both by the PR people and your readers. I posted a negative review of some lotion that was just terrible, and the PR company simply sent me a different kind to try. By sending it back or withholding your opinion, I&#8217;d think you were being dishonest. In fact I&#8217;m really suspicious of something when I only ever see gushing reviews for it.</p>
<p>Memarie Lanes last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MemarieLane/~3/291331293/tell-me-truth-now.html" rel="nofollow">Tell me the truth now.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
